Swiss lawmakers are pushing for a crackdown on bicycle theft, arguing that current laws allow thieves to escape with minimal penalties. A new legislative proposal seeks to close a legal loophole that often results in perpetrators receiving only a small fine, even when stealing high-value e-bikes.
The initiative is led by SVP National Councilor Lukas Reimann, who has filed a motion requesting that the Federal Council reclassify “theft for use” from a mere contravention to a more serious offense. Reimann, a representative from St. Gallen, is calling for “effective criminal sanctions” to replace the current lenient system.
Under Article 94 of the Road Traffic Act, individuals who steal a bicycle simply to secure from one point to another—known as “entwendung zum Gebrauch” or theft for use—often face only an administrative fine. Reimann describes this as a “classic legal loophole,” noting that thieves frequently use the excuse that they “found” the bike or only intended to use it briefly to avoid harsher punishment.
The issue has personal significance for Reimann, who no longer owns a bicycle after having his stolen twice. He highlighted the disparity between the cost of the vehicles—some worth several thousand francs—and the meager fines imposed on those who steal them.
The push for reform has gained bipartisan support, with SP National Councilor Hasan Candan backing the move in hopes that stricter penalties will serve as a deterrent. The proposal now awaits a response from Transport Minister Albert Rösti.
The scale of the problem is significant, with over 50,000 bicycles stolen across Switzerland annually. The financial impact is substantial for both victims and insurance providers; for instance, the insurer Mobiliar reported paying out 31 million francs in 2023 alone for stolen two-wheelers.
This legislative push underscores a growing frustration among law enforcement and citizens in Swiss cities, where dozens of thefts occur daily. By shifting the legal classification of these crimes, lawmakers aim to ensure that the punishment fits the crime, regardless of the thief’s claimed intent.
