Fenerbahçe is dropping points in the Turkish Süper Lig, and questions are being raised about coach Domenico Tedesco’s decisions. A recent match against Gençlerbirliği saw Fenerbahçe come back from 2-0 down, but ultimately the team’s performance raised concerns about squad management and tactical choices.
One key point of contention is the continued use of N’Golo Kante, who appears to be struggling with fatigue. Critics question whether it was wise to maintain the veteran midfielder on the pitch for the full 90 minutes, especially in a crucial away game. The debate centers on whether prioritizing Kante’s fitness is more important than securing a win.
Adding to the challenges, young forward Cherif is still integrating into the team and needs time to build chemistry with his teammates. The situation was further complicated by Asensio’s quiet performance for much of the match, only finding the net in the second half. Prior to Asensio’s goal, a tactical decision to play with three defenders limited Guendouzi’s impact in midfield.
Tedesco’s substitutions also came under scrutiny. The late introduction of two players in the 87th minute raised questions about their potential contribution, especially considering Kerem was the only player performing well in the first half.
Throughout the season, concerns have been voiced regarding Tedesco’s apparent preference for Mert Müldür. When Semedo suffered an injury, Müldür was brought on, but was then substituted in the second half, potentially impacting the player’s confidence.
Despite a late push, Fenerbahçe was unable to secure the victory. Asensio had a clear header that missed the frame, and Nene’s attempt in the final seconds hit the post.
A critical assessment of Tedesco’s tactics concluded with the statement: “In modern football, it’s unnatural for a player who is walking to remain on the field for 90 minutes.”
