:watermark(https://f.pmo.ee//logos/4133/bb989514d16b88b940b51f02e07642d0.png,-2p,-2p,0,18,none):format(webp)/nginx/o/2025/11/19/17285654t1h658f.jpg "17285654t1h658f.jpg")
Luxembourg – In a landmark ruling with potential repercussions across the European Union, the EU Court of Justice ruled Thursday that member states must recognize same-sex marriages performed in othre EU countries, even if they do not offer the same rights within their own borders [[1]], [[2]]. The case, originating in Poland where same-sex civil unions are not legally recognized, centers on a man denied the right to register his marriage to another man performed in Germany [[3]], and underscores a growing conflict between national laws and EU-wide standards of inclusivity and free movement. While the court’s decision doesn’t compel nations to legalize same-sex marriage,it mandates equal treatment in recognizing unions legally established elsewhere within the bloc.
Poland is obligated to recognize marriages between same-sex couples legally performed in other European Union member states, the EU Court of Justice ruled on Thursday. The decision addresses a case concerning a man who was denied the right to register his marriage in Poland, where same-sex unions are not legally recognized.
The court found that Poland’s refusal to register the marriage contravenes EU law, infringing not only on the right to free movement and residence within the EU, but also on fundamental rights to respect for private and family life. This ruling highlights the ongoing tension between national sovereignty and EU-wide legal standards regarding LGBTQ+ rights.
However, the Court clarified that this obligation to recognize such marriages does not impinge upon national identity or threaten public order in the country where the marriage originated. “It does not mean that the Member State in question is required to provide for the possibility of marriage between two persons of the same sex in its own national law,” the court stated.
Member states retain discretion in how they recognize these marriages, with registration of foreign marriage certificates being just one possible method, the court explained.
Crucially, the court emphasized that any procedures for recognition must not render it impossible or unduly difficult, nor should they discriminate against same-sex couples based on their sexual orientation. A lack of a recognition procedure equivalent to that offered to heterosexual couples constitutes such discrimination, the court found.
“Since registration is the sole means provided for in Polish law whereby the administrative authorities can actually recognize a marriage concluded in another Member State, Poland is obliged to apply it in the same way to marriages between persons of the same sex as to marriages between persons of opposite sex,” the EU Court of Justice concluded. The ruling could prompt similar legal challenges in other EU countries with restrictive policies on same-sex marriage recognition.
