A political and legal controversy is unfolding in france after the mayor and all of his deputies in Chessy, Seine-et-Marne, resigned en masse to avoid presiding over a marriage with potential implications for an ongoing deportation case. The unusual mass resignation, which occurred December 15, has quickly become a flashpoint in debates over immigration enforcement and the scope of legal obligations for public officials [[1]]. The incident is fueling calls from the right for constitutional reform,raising questions about the balance between humanitarian law and national sovereignty within the French legal framework.
A French mayor and his deputies resigned en masse December 15, rather than preside over a marriage that would have legally complicated the deportation of the groom, an undocumented immigrant. The case has ignited a debate on the right over the scope of France’s legal obligations and calls for constitutional reform.
Article réservé à nos abonnés
La France se dote de nouvelles méthodes d’interception en mer des migrants traversant la Manche
Olivier Bourjot, the right-leaning mayor of Chessy, Seine-et-Marne, stepped down along with his deputies to avoid officiating the marriage. The groom is subject to a deportation order. The incident has prompted calls from some on the right to fundamentally “change the rule of law” in France.
Bruno Retailleau, president of the Les Républicains party, reacted Wednesday, December 17, stating that the situation necessitates a change to the French Constitution. He argued for a revision “to restore power to the people, to allow the people to choose.” The case underscores growing tensions over immigration policy and the balance between legal obligations and national sovereignty.
France’s Constitutional Council has previously ruled that the freedom to marry falls under personal liberty, which is protected by Articles 2 and 4 of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. The council has stated that “the irregular status of a foreigner should not, in itself, be an obstacle to his marriage.”
On the social media platform X, Eric Zemmour, president of Reconquête!, described the Chessy case as “yet another episode of the rule of law turned against the French people and those who serve them.” Two government ministers expressed similar sentiments, though in more measured terms.
Government spokesperson Maud Bregeon stated she offered “full support” to Bourjot, while acknowledging the situation was “obviously incomprehensible to our citizens.” She added, “Nevertheless, there is the rule of law, which must be applied. Can we evolve the law? Perhaps,” suggesting that doing so would require “a constitutional amendment.”
Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez echoed those concerns Wednesday, December 17, saying, “You are marrying someone who normally shouldn’t be here. As a citizen, obviously that shocks me.” He continued, “After, there are the rules of law that apply.” Nuñez conceded that the situation “seems aberrant, things we no longer understand.”
Il vous reste 53.8% de cet article à lire. La suite est réservée aux abonnés.
