Moscow is sharply criticizing the U.S. Coast Guard‘s recent seizure of the tanker Marina, alleging a violation of international maritime law and warning of potential escalation. While the incident initially appeared connected to Venezuela, Russian officials claim the action sets a risky precedent with broader implications for regional security, particularly in the Baltic and Nordic seas. The Kremlin’s response – thus far limited to diplomatic statements – has been deemed insufficient by Russian media, which is now calling for a more assertive defense of its civilian shipping interests, possibly involving naval deployments and a new state-backed legal enforcement agency.
“Russia has so far responded only at the ministerial level. This reaction to the seizure of the tanker is clearly insufficient.”
– reads an article from the Russian portal.
The outlet reports that the seized tanker, the Marina, was obtained by the U.S. Coast Guard completely illegally, violating international maritime regulations with the action.
“The Foreign Ministry has called on [the United States] to treat the crew humanely. This is not enough.”
– writes the publication.
The report emphasizes that the entire issue does not concern Venezuela, as Russia and the Latin American country have minimal economic ties, conducting only $200 million in trade annually.
“The situation is much more serious than that – this is a precedent. If the Baltic states (and the Finns, Swedes, and Danes) decide that Russian civilian ships can be seized and receive only ministerial responses, terrible times are coming.”
– reads the Russian portal.
Finally, the outlet suggests that Russian state bodies protect Russian civilian transport ships with warships and create a state agency exclusively dedicated to enforcing international law – and staffed only by people who previously served in special forces. This suggestion likely implies that these “legal experts” would be prepared to confront NATO member states with force if further ships are attempted to be seized.
The featured image is an illustration. Featured image source: Getty Images
Moscow has criticized the United States’ seizure of a tanker, the Marina, and warned that further such actions could lead to a significant escalation of tensions. The incident, which has drawn little public attention outside of Russia, is raising concerns about the potential for maritime confrontations as geopolitical rivalries intensify.
According to reports from Russian media, the U.S. Coast Guard’s actions were “completely illegal” and a violation of international maritime law. The Russian Foreign Ministry has called for the humane treatment of the vessel’s crew, but Moscow views this as an insufficient response to what it considers a provocative act.
While the seizure initially appeared to be linked to Venezuela, Russian sources claim the issue is far broader. Economic ties between Russia and Venezuela are relatively limited, with bilateral trade amounting to approximately $200 million per year. The concern in Moscow centers on the precedent this sets for future actions.
“Russia has so far responded only at the ministerial level. This reaction to the seizure of the tanker is clearly insufficient.”
The Russian outlet warns that if Baltic states – and potentially Finland, Sweden, and Denmark – begin seizing Russian civilian vessels with only a minimal response from Moscow, “terrible times are coming.”
In response, the publication suggests a more assertive posture from Russian authorities. This includes deploying warships to protect civilian transport vessels and establishing a dedicated state agency focused on enforcing international law. Notably, the agency would be comprised of personnel with prior experience in special forces, hinting at a willingness to confront potential seizures with force.
“The situation is much more serious than that – this is a precedent. If the Baltic states (and the Finns, Swedes, and Danes) decide that Russian civilian ships can be seized and receive only ministerial responses, terrible times are coming.”
The development underscores growing regional tensions and raises questions about the limits of international maritime law in a period of heightened geopolitical competition.
