For PC enthusiasts, the speed of a computer is often measured in frames per second, but a new report from PC games Hardware Plus examines a less-obvious, yet equally vital, metric: time saved. While modern processors boast increasing power, quantifying the real-world impact of that power-and how it translates into a more responsive user experience-has remained a challenge. This in-depth analysis focuses on the frequently enough-overlooked impact of CPU performance on tasks like shader compilation and file manipulation, providing a standardized benchmark for measuring efficiency and identifying tangible benefits for gamers and power users.
The Time-Saving Effect: CPU Performance Under Scrutiny
We’ve all experienced it: a computer startup that requires a full coffee break before programs load and the system is fully operational. While modern computers have mitigated this issue compared to devices from decades past, the underlying calculations have actually become more demanding – and hardware has risen to meet the challenge. But for those who prioritize a responsive system with minimal latency, the wait can still be frustrating. Determining how to objectively measure “time saved” on a PC has been a long-standing question. While individual CPUs may *feel* faster, quantifying that difference requires a standardized approach.
To address this, testing focused on compiling shaders in modern games, a process where the CPU plays a critical role and completion can be directly compared. This is a key area where processing power directly impacts user experience, as shader compilation can significantly affect initial game load times.
PC Games Hardware Plus
Buy article for €0.99
or ad-free access and access to all PLUS articles (monthly subscription)
Subscribe to Plus for €4.80
Please log in to your PCGH-Community account to purchase this article.
You can find all offers for Plus (monthly subscription, annual subscription, upgrades for ad-free access) on our support page
Modern CPUs deliver not only more frames per second, but, crucially, they save you time. In this comprehensive PCGH-Plus test, we demonstrate for the first time how significant the differences are in real-world scenarios. From the cold start of current games with massive shader compilation to warm starts, and realistic workloads like unpacking large data volumes with 7-Zip – the results are often striking. The gap between older quad-core processors and current high-end CPUs isn’t measured in minutes, but in substantial amounts of waiting time. We detail why shader compilation places such a heavy load on the CPU, the role of cores, threads, and architecture, and why even the graphics card influences loading times. We also provide exclusive benchmarks, an assessment of current and older CPUs, and concrete upgrade recommendations for gamers and power users. This article sheds light on a frequently underestimated performance factor.
Read the full article exclusively with PCGH-Plus!
INFO: You can purchase PCGH-Plus articles individually or purchase a Plus subscription.
As a PCGH-Digital subscriber, you receive free access to all Plus articles.
The testing methodology included evaluating Dragon Age: The Veilguard, which requires extensive shader compilation before gameplay. In addition to this “cold start,” the tests measured warm start times after the initial compilation of Dragon Age and Baldur’s Gate 3, tracking the time from clicking “play” to the game being ready. Finally, all processors were tested on their ability to unpack a large folder using 7-Zip. The folder contained 37,143 files, 3,976 subfolders, and a total size of 84.5 GB – a demanding task for any CPU.
