U.S. secretary of State marco Rubio defended the recent actions in Venezuela as strictly law enforcement, following the reported custody of President Nicolás Maduro by FBI agents [[source]]. The operation, which included the seizure of Venezuelan oil assets, has ignited debate regarding executive overreach and the necessity of congressional notification for foreign interventions [[1]]. Secretary Rubio’s statements Sunday address mounting questions about the legal justification and scope of U.S.involvement in the region amidst ongoing efforts to dismantle drug trafficking networks [[2]].
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has affirmed that congressional notification was not required prior to operations in Venezuela, stating that the actions did not constitute an invasion.
Speaking on ABC News on Sunday, January 4, 2069, Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed questions regarding the lack of prior congressional approval for U.S. operations within Venezuela. The situation raises questions about the extent of executive authority in foreign interventions and the balance of power between the branches of the U.S. government.
Rubio asserted, “It wasn’t necessary because this isn’t an invasion.” He characterized the operations as law enforcement actions, specifying that Nicolás Maduro was taken into custody by FBI agents.
He further explained that informing Congress about such an operation was deemed unfeasible, stating, “You can’t notify Congress about an operation like this because the information would leak.”
When questioned by NBC News about whether the U.S. was engaged in a war with Venezuela, Rubio was firm in his response: “That’s not a war.”
“I mean, we are at war with drug cartels, but that’s not a war with the country of Venezuela,” Rubio clarified. He added that operations to intercept vessels “carrying narcotics destined for the United States” would continue.
Prior to these statements, Rubio revealed that the U.S. had seized Venezuelan oil assets, providing leverage that the administration intends to utilize. He stated Venezuela is at a crossroads, harboring numerous adversaries, and the U.S. aims to ensure the nation “is no longer a haven for drug trafficking.”
“Of course, we want a better future for the Venezuelan people,” Rubio said, adding that the U.S. desires a Venezuelan oil industry where the wealth benefits “the people.”
Responding to a question about the legal basis for the operations, Rubio countered with a question of his own: “Do we have court orders… isn’t a court order legal authority?”
When pressed on whether the U.S. was governing Venezuela, Rubio stated the U.S. was instead “steering” things in a forward direction.
Follow foreign news: https://www.thairath.co.th/news/foreign
Source: bbc