Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico is pushing for a delay in the implementation of the European Union’s updated Emissions Trading System, known as ETS2, arguing that the recent financial burdens would come at an inopportune time for his country and others in Central Europe.
Fico has been vocal in his demand that the European Commission postpone the rollout of ETS2, which is set to commence in 2028 following the adoption of the revised European Climate Law. He contends that introducing additional costs related to carbon pricing now would exacerbate economic pressures already being felt across the region.
The Slovak leader’s stance aligns with growing concerns from several EU member states about the rising cost of energy and the broader implications of climate policy on national economies. Italy, Austria, and Slovenia have too expressed reservations, with some calling for a reassessment of the Emissions Trading System amid ongoing volatility in global energy markets.
Fico’s call for a delay comes as he prepares to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for an official visit to Slovakia in May. The meeting is expected to cover a range of bilateral and EU-wide issues, including energy security and climate policy coordination.
During recent discussions with his Austrian and Czech counterparts, Fico framed his position as part of a broader effort to ensure that EU climate measures do not disproportionately impact countries with limited fiscal flexibility. He has emphasized the need for solidarity and a differentiated approach within the bloc’s green transition framework.
The pushback against ETS2 reflects a wider debate within the European Union about how to balance ambitious climate goals with economic competitiveness, particularly in light of recent geopolitical developments that have disrupted energy supplies and driven up prices across the continent.
While the European Commission has maintained that the Emissions Trading System remains a central tool for achieving emissions reduction targets, it has acknowledged the need for ongoing review and dialogue with member states to address implementation challenges.
