The Israel Securities Authority (ISA) is advancing a regulatory reform that would fundamentally restructure corporate reporting, aiming to reduce technical disclosure burdens while shifting focus toward qualitative management analysis. The initiative, proposed by the Hamdani Committee, seeks to replace standard board reports with management-centric documents, significantly altering how public companies communicate with investors.
Shifting from Technical Compliance to Managerial Insight
For years, the traditional board report has become a source of frustration for investors, often serving as a repetitive, technical document that obscures the actual health of a business. According to Bizportal, the current disclosure regime prioritizes volume over clarity, leading to a regulatory overload that hinders an investor’s ability to identify material data. The Hamdani Committee, established by ISA Chair Adv. Osnat Cohen-Lifshitz, seeks to rectify this by streamlining the periodic report structure, which has grown increasingly voluminous due to cumulative amendments over the past two decades.
The Hamdani Committee’s reform proposal aims to replace this format with a "management report." This new structure is designed to offer a clearer view of the company’s operations through the lens of its leadership. Instead of merely reciting financial statement data, companies would be required to provide a qualitative business analysis that includes management’s forecasts, market trends, key performance indicators (KPIs), and non-GAAP metrics. This approach aligns with global trends seen in major international markets, where the emphasis has shifted toward the “Management Discussion and Analysis” (MD&A) model.
"The board report will become focused and accurate and will allow investors to see the company through the eyes of management."
Changes to Immediate Disclosure Requirements
While the reform aims to sharpen the quality of periodic reports, it also introduces significant changes to the landscape of immediate reporting—the disclosures companies must file when specific events occur. TheMarker reports that some current immediate reporting requirements, such as the disclosure of negotiations regarding potential transactions, may be eliminated under the new framework. In the current regime, the Securities Law requires immediate reporting on the commencement of negotiations for a transaction that is not in the ordinary course of business, a rule that has often led to the disclosure of preliminary, non-binding talks that may never materialize.
This shift reflects a broader intent to reduce the "noise" that currently forces companies to report on events before the full picture is clear. By easing these requirements, regulators hope to prevent the premature disclosure of information that lacks substantial context, though the proposal has prompted questions regarding whether investors should be concerned about the loss of real-time data. Critics within the investment community have previously argued that immediate reports act as a vital signal for market volatility, and the removal of these triggers could delay price discovery.
"Companies on the stock exchange will not be required to report on events that send stocks soaring."
Strengthening Accountability via Executive Signatures
A central pillar of the proposed reform is the expansion of personal accountability for corporate disclosures. Under the current rules, the requirement for a joint signature from the chairman of the board and the CEO applies only to the board report and financial statements. The Hamdani Committee recommends extending this requirement to cover all chapters of periodic reports, ensuring that the oversight responsibility is comprehensive.
This change is intended to serve as more than a mere legal formality. By mandating that top executives sign off on all sections, the regulator aims to instill a stronger sense of managerial and psychological responsibility. As noted by Bizportal, this requirement is expected to increase the rigor and control applied during the preparation of corporate filings, as executives will be held personally accountable for the information presented to the market. This mirrors the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) framework in the United States, which emphasizes executive certification of financial accuracy to mitigate corporate fraud and misrepresentation.
"The chairman of the board and the CEO [will be required to sign]."
What Comes Next for Public Companies
The move toward "less noise, more essence" represents one of the most significant overhauls of corporate disclosure in Israel in recent years. For public companies, the next phase involves transitioning away from the rigid, formulaic reporting style that has characterized the market for years. The reform remains subject to further legislative review and potential public comment periods before becoming part of the formal Securities Regulations.
Investors can expect to see a consolidation of governance and financing chapters into dedicated sections, providing a more transparent view of capital structure, liquidity, and executive compensation. While the transition aims to simplify the regulatory burden, the ultimate success of the reform will depend on how effectively management teams utilize the new qualitative reporting format to provide genuine insight into their business strategies. The ISA’s push for this modernization underscores a strategic effort to maintain the competitiveness of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) by reducing administrative costs for issuers while enhancing the utility of filings for institutional and retail market participants alike.
Find more reporting in our Business section.
