Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Conversion Therapy Case
The Supreme Court today heard oral arguments in a case concerning the constitutionality of state laws banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ youth, a practice widely discredited by medical and psychological organizations.
Justices heard arguments in Theberge v. Montgomery, challenging a law passed in the state of Montgomery prohibiting licensed therapists from providing treatment aimed at changing a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Attorneys for the plaintiffs, a group of therapists, argued the law violates their First Amendment rights to free speech and religious expression. They contend the law unduly restricts their ability to offer counseling services to clients who voluntarily seek help. “This law doesn’t protect anyone; it silences therapists and prevents individuals from pursuing the help they desire,” stated the plaintiffs’ lead counsel during the proceedings.
Representing the state of Montgomery, attorneys argued the ban is a legitimate exercise of the state’s power to protect vulnerable youth from harmful and ineffective practices. They presented evidence from the American Psychological Association and other leading medical groups demonstrating the significant psychological harm caused by conversion therapy, including increased rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide. The state’s attorney emphasized, “Our responsibility is to safeguard the well-being of our young people, and that includes protecting them from practices that have been proven to be damaging.” This case arrives as several states grapple with legislation aimed at protecting LGBTQ+ youth from discriminatory practices.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for similar laws in other states and potentially establish a national standard regarding the legality of conversion therapy. The Court is expected to issue a ruling by late June 2026. Following today’s arguments, several justices indicated a need to further consider the balance between free speech rights and the state’s interest in protecting minors; more information on the Supreme Court’s docket can be found on the Court’s official website. The Trevor Project offers resources and support for LGBTQ+ youth at their website.
The Court will continue to deliberate, and a decision is anticipated in the coming months.
