Brussels – A call for dialogue with Russia from Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever has sparked a swift rebuke from his own Foreign Minister, highlighting deep divisions within the European Union regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine. The debate centers on whether engaging with Moscow is a necessary step toward a peaceful resolution, or if such talks would be perceived as a sign of weakness.
De Wever, speaking in interviews published on March 14, 2026, argued that the EU must negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring the conflict to an finish and begin normalizing relations. He expressed skepticism that Europe could compel Russia to concede through military force or economic sanctions, questioning the continued pursuit of a war without a clear path to victory. “How much sense does it make to continue the war if there is no clear victory in sight?” he asked.
But, Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot swiftly countered that discussing normalization with Russia at this juncture would be “a signal of weakness that undermines the European unity we need more than ever.” Prévot affirmed that Belgium and Europe remain steadfast in their support for Ukraine’s fight for independence, and that this support will not waver. The development underscores the complex and often conflicting approaches to the crisis within the EU.
While acknowledging the need for dialogue – defining it as talking even with those with whom one disagrees – Prévot stressed that dialogue is not synonymous with normalization. She pointed out that Russia currently refuses to engage constructively at the negotiating table, maintaining maximalist demands. Diplomatic relations with Moscow have not been severed precisely to maintain channels for communication, she explained.
According to Prévot, the purpose of sanctions and military aid to Ukraine is to create the conditions for credible negotiations, allowing Ukrainians to determine their own future. Prematurely easing pressure on Russia, she warned, would be giving Putin what he is waiting for.
Prévot also cautioned against naiveté, stating that Russian destabilizing activities are unlikely to cease with the end of the war, as they are part of a deliberate and long-term strategy. She emphasized the vital necessity of European unity in the face of this ongoing threat.
The conflict has also served as a stark reminder of Europe’s energy vulnerabilities, Prévot added. Reducing dependence on fossil fuels is not only a climate issue but also a strategic imperative. She called on the United States to maintain pressure, including on energy matters, and avoid sending mixed signals, such as the recent easing of sanctions on oil.
“Belgium and Europe support Ukraine in its struggle for independence,” Prévot concluded. “Our support will not weaken. The door to dialogue must remain open, but the normalization of relations with Russia is not on the horizon.”