L.A. Charter Reform Commission Faces Delays, Transparency Concerns
Los Angeles’ Charter Reform Commission is struggling to make significant progress nearly four months after a delayed start, raising questions about its ability to deliver meaningful changes to the city’s governing document.
The commission, formed in the wake of recent City Hall scandals, was tasked with recommending revisions to the city charter – essentially the city’s constitution – by early 2026. City officials had hoped the commission would address issues like City Council expansion, ranked-choice voting, and accountability for indicted officials. However, several commissioners and advocates have expressed concerns about transparency and independence, with some fearing the commission may become a tool for political agendas or further delay necessary reforms. This comes at a critical time as Los Angeles seeks to restore public trust in its local government.
Commission Chair Raymond Meza acknowledged the abbreviated timeline presents challenges. “I just want to be honest with the public,” Meza said. “I think they would understand that considering the amount of time that we have, I know that we are going to absolutely do our best.” The commission’s work was initially hampered by delays in appointments; the first meeting wasn’t held until June 10th, eight months after initial approval, and a vacancy remains following a withdrawn nomination. Some commissioners have also reported being discouraged from speaking to the press, though Meza and the commission’s executive director deny issuing such instructions. Concerns about staff influence are also being raised, with some suggesting the mayor and council president’s selection of staff undermines the commission’s authority. For more information on city governance, visit the Los Angeles Almanac.
Rev. James Thomas, a commissioner and president of the San Fernando Valley branch of the NAACP, voiced concerns about a lack of focus on issues affecting Black Angelenos and alleged attempts to silence his advocacy. “They want me to shut up,” Thomas told LAist, “and I’m not going to shut up.” The City Council is currently considering a motion to require disclosure of communications between commissioners and elected officials, but it has yet to be scheduled for a vote. The commission is now focused on gathering input from stakeholders and plans to begin voting on recommendations later this year. You can find more details about the commission’s work on its official website.
Meza stated the commission will continue to hear from stakeholders, academics, and city department heads, with a goal of finalizing recommendations by early next year for consideration by the City Council and a potential place on the November 2026 ballot.
